Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Everybody Loves Iowa (The Atlantic Wire)

As the Republican primary heats up, that can only mean more ads. Which ones succeed? Which fail? We'll be reviewing them as they come out. Today, Mitt Romney sucks up to Iowa, Michele Bachmann dubs herself the Iron Lady, and normal people love Ron Paul.

Related: GOP Debate to Lead the Free World

Related: Don't Forget There Are Seven Other Presidential Candidates

The Ad: Mitt Romney, "Restore America's Greatness"

Related: GOP Debate Preview: Hey, We're Not So Bad

The Issues: America (particularly Iowa), its greatness (especially Iowa's), and the restoring of said greatness (again with the Iowa's).

Related: GOP Debate: Newt Can't Hide It When He Thinks You're Stupid

The Message: Hey Iowa! Mitt Romney's driving through your town with his sleeves up, humbly asking for your help so he can fix America one?hilarious Kim Kardashian joke?at a time. No, but seriously folks, Obama's socialism has been pessimistic and bad, but Romney's stern corporate optimism (hm?) will be the light that leads us out of this mess. Are you listening, Iowa? Really particularly Iowa should be listening to this. Until after tomorrow, then everyone should be listening. (But especially people in New Hampshire.)

Related: The Hot Or Not Primary

Who It's For: Iowans.

What Everyone Else Sees: Blatant pandering to Iowans, awkward attempts to seem folksy.

The Effect: Obviously Romney needs to inspire more people than his typical businessy drone and lacquered-hair smarm tend to, but just literally rolling up one's sleeves and showing pretty pictures of flat farmland aren't exactly going to do that. Still, the photography is attractive and so is Mitt's wife, so this has probably won a heart or a mind somewhere in the Hawkeye State. B

The Ad: Michele Bachmann, "Michele's Voice"

The Issues: Ronald Reagan, Margaret Thatcher, Barack Obama = Jimmy Carter

The Message: Michele Bachmann is the American Margaret Thatcher. That is basically what the entire ad is saying. Bachmann might be capitalizing on the new film The Iron Lady, though she should be careful about associating herself with known liberal Meryl Streep. We're not entirely sure why this is called "Michele's Voice" when Bachmann's voice isn't exactly the best thing about her, but oh well.

Who It's For: Voters (Iowa ones in particular) who are looking for a real political hero rather than just a politician.

What Everyone Else Sees: Somewhat delusional comparisons, an unpleasant voice.

The Effect: Bachmann's probably reaching the end of her presidential road, and so it's mostly just sad seeing her still hoping to be someone as huge as Margaret Thatcher (whether you liked her or not, the woman was a force). But at least she's got her bus friends to keep her company. C-

The Ad: Ron Paul, "Believe"

The Issues: Trust, Consistency, Big Government, Taxes

The Message: A bunch of diverse looking everyday Americans speak out in support of Ron Paul because he's something different, an outsider (with three decades of congress under his belt) who says "No" to all the fat cats. These aren't wacko tin foil hat libertarians, and they're not Kelly Clarkson either. They're just regular folks, folksy folks, homey folks, looking for something new and different. This is the human side of Ron Paul's big ideas.

Who It's For: People who think all Paul supporters are weirdos, people who still don't know what he's all about, Iowans unimpressed by the rest of the old guard in the race.

What Everyone Else Sees: Some of these people look like wackos.

The Effect: Paul has to walk a tricky line of trying to ingratiate himself to more centrist voters yet also sticking firm to his outsider, renegade image. Here he's probably wise to put a bunch of normals on display instead of himself ? if someone who looks like your second grade teacher could vote for Ron Paul maybe you could vote for Ron Paul ? but it might be too little normal too late. B

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/gop/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20120102/pl_atlantic/everybodylovesiowa46871

black friday news gamestop albert haynesworth banana republic apple store academy barnes and noble nook

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Dad of missing toddler: ?What you are doing isn?t right?

For the first time since his daughter was last seen on Dec. 16, the father of a missing Maine toddler spoke publicly Monday about the search for Ayla Reynolds and appealed to her abductor to return her safely.

Justin DiPietro, who was the last one to see his 20-month-old daughter when he put her to bed more than two weeks ago, spoke exclusively with TODAY?s Peter Alexander about his daughter?s disappearance, which was ruled a criminal investigation Friday by police in Waterville, Maine.

?By coming here, it was in hopes of reaching out to the person that does have my daughter to let them know that what they?re doing isn?t right,?? DiPietro said from Maine in the live interview Monday morning. ?You may think what you?re doing is right for Ayla, but it?s not. You have no right. You?re not her parent. She belongs home with her family.

?I just want my daughter. I?m doing anything possible that I can to get my daughter home. It feels like a hopeless situation at some points, but I?m doing what I can.?

No suspects have been named by police, but DiPietro?s parenting skills have been questioned by the girl?s mother, Trista Reynolds, who appeared on TODAY last week. Reynolds underwent a 10-day stint in a rehabilitation program for alcohol abuse in October, during which time she and DiPietro agreed that he would take care of their daughter. Before her disappearance, Ayla had a soft cast on her left arm in what police called an accident.

'She's the world to me'
Throughout most of the interview, DiPietro spoke in an unemotional monotone, but his eyes lit up when asked about his feelings toward his daughter and he smiled, becoming slightly choked up.

?I love my daughter,?? DiPietro said. ?I would never do anything to harm my daughter. She?s the world to me.??

In a statement released exclusively to TODAY Sunday night, Reynolds said, ?When I found out from law enforcement that this has become a criminal investigation I got chills up and down my spine, but I am keeping my faith. I am not giving up.??

Ronald Reynolds, the child?s grandfather, also has been ?begging and pleading?? for Ayla?s return and has been wearing a green ribbon, which is the symbol for missing children.

Authorities have scoured nearby lakes, woods, fields and private properties for weeks and have spent significant time investigating DiPietro?s home in search of the child after determining that Ayla, who had recently started walking, did not leave the house on her own. A privately-funded $30,000 reward also has been posted, leading to nearly 400 tips from as far away as California regarding her disappearance.

On Friday, authorities announced that it has become a criminal investigation.

    1. Dad of missing toddler: ?What you are doing isn?t right?

      In his first interview, the father Maine girl missing for two weeks urges her return.

    2. Why Brand and Perry called it quits
    3. Paralyzed Carolina bride still hopes to walk again
    4. The year in celebrity baby names
    5. 5 ways to earn extra cash this year

?We believe that foul play has occurred in connection with Ayla?s disappearance,? the Waterville Police Department said in a statement. ?We base our conclusions on evidence by investigators during the past two weeks.??

Defending his silence
While Reynolds has appeared publicly multiple times since Ayla went missing, Monday marked DiPietro?s first public appearance. He had previously released statements through the Waterville police and has been cooperating with authorities during the entire investigation. On the night of Dec. 16, he said he put Ayla to bed as she wore polka dot pajamas that read ?Daddy?s Little Princess?? on them. At 8 a.m. on Dec. 17, DiPietro went to check on her and found she was gone, officially reporting her missing at 8:50 a.m.

?He said he?s not in hiding, but why won?t he come out??? Reynolds told TODAY last week. ?Why won?t he talk to me? Why is he staying away? What is he so afraid of, to not come out and talk to me???

Story: ?Just talk to me,? mom of missing Maine tot begs dad

In Monday's interview, DiPietro defended his silence. ?Initially, the first few days I was emotionally incapable of coming out to do an interview,?? he told Alexander. ?I had been advised that by coming on and doing an interview by law enforcement that it could possibly hinder the investigation, and I?m here to help in any way I can.??

Reynolds said last week on TODAY that she and DiPietro have not spoken since their daughter?s disappearance and that she had concerns about her daughter?s safety while living with DiPietro. Reynolds lives 75 miles away in South Portland, and she last saw her daughter on Nov. 21. A day before Ayla?s disappearance, Reynolds filed for ?parental rights and responsibilities?? regarding custody of Ayla.

?He would never let me see her,?? Reynolds told TODAY. ?I would call to talk to her, and he would get mad about it. If I did see her and I would notice something on her like a bruise or just something, instead of reacting in a calm manner, he would lash out about it or kind of go into defense.??

?As far as I know, there was never any concerns,?? DiPietro said Monday. ?We both agreed that me having her at this point in time was the best thing for her. She?s my child. She?s my world. She?s everything to me.??

Although the investigation has now become a criminal one, DiPietro has not been made aware of any other major developments by investigators.

Story: Dad of missing toddler: ?What you are doing isn?t right?

?As far as I know, that?s just been a change in terminology,?? he said. ?As far as I know we?re at the same place that we were at on Day One with this.??

Anyone with information regarding the child?s disappearance is urged to contact the Maine State Police at 207-624-7076.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/45846319/ns/today-today_people/

mary did you know seattle seahawks grammy nominations philadelphia eagles vince young vince young john carter

Google vuole sapere dove sono stati i vostri Android

Come ben sapete, di Android in giro non ci sono solo smartphone o tablet, ma ci sono anche gadget, peluches, origami e quant?altro, che vanno in giro per il mondo e nei negozi che trattano di tali articoli, entrando di conseguenza nelle case dei consumatori. Proprio per questo Google?ha indetto una specie di concorso che [...]
Leggi tutto l?articolo

Ti piace questo articolo? Condividilo:

Source: http://colombom.altervista.org/blog/2012/01/03/google-vuole-sapere-dove-sono-stati-i-vostri-android/

uekman music awards music awards giants eagles bcs rankings week 13 bcs rankings week 13 philadelphia marathon

Monday, January 2, 2012

Texas to Mexico Daily Livestock Exports

USDA ??|?? Updated: December 30, 2011

AL_LS600???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Las?Cruces,?NM????Fri?Dec?30,?2011????USDA?Market?News?????????????????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Texas?to?Mexico?Daily?Livestock?Exports????????????????????????????????????????
Species????????????????????Exports??????Current???Current???Previous???????????
??????????????????????????12/29/2011???Week-T-D????Y-T-D??????Y-T-D????????????
???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Dairy?totals?include?577?head?of?Canadian?Dairy.???????????????????????????????
Hog?totals?include?1508?head?of?Canadian?Hogs.?????????????????????????????????

Beef?Cattle????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Slaughter?????????????????????0???????????0????????0???????????0????????????
???Breeding?Males????????????????0???????????0??????364?????????567????????????
???Breeding?Females??????????????0???????????0??????471?????????843????????????
???Total?Beef?Cattle?????????????0???????????0??????835???????1,410????????????

Hogs???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Slaughter?????????????????????0???????????0????????0???????????0????????????
???Breeding?Males????????????????0???????????0????1,277???????1,281????????????
???Breeding?Females??????????????0???????????0????5,287???????3,127????????????
???Total?Hogs????????????????????0???????????0????6,564???????4,408????????????

Sheep??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Slaughter?Lambs???????????????0???????????0????????0???????????0????????????
???Slaughter?Ewes????????????????0???????????0???13,004??????79,855????????????
???Breeding?Males????????????????0???????????0???????23??????????59????????????
???Breeding?Females??????????????0???????????0???????15???????????0????????????
???Total?Sheep???????????????????0???????????0???13,042??????79,914????????????

Dairy?Cattle???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Breeding?Males????????????????0???????????0???????20??????????42????????????
???Breeding?Females????????????169?????????169????8,779???????9,917????????????
???Total?Dairy?Cattle??????????169?????????169????8,799???????9,959????????????

Goats??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Angora????????????????????????0???????????0????????0???????????0????????????
???Spanish???????????????????????0???????????0??????325?????????710????????????
???Other?????????????????????????0???????????0????????0??????????22????????????
???Total?Goats???????????????????0???????????0??????325?????????732????????????

Horses?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
???Slaughter????????????????????27?????????889???56,576??????42,413????????????
???Breeding?Males????????????????7??????????26????1,705???????2,156????????????
???Breeding?Females??????????????2??????????63????2,672???????3,162????????????
???Geldings??????????????????????0??????????18??????428?????????518????????????
???Burro/Mule/Pony???????????????0???????????0??????266?????????129????????????
???Total?Horses?????????????????36?????????996???61,647??????48,378????????????

Exotics??????????????????????????0???????????0??????287?????????737????????????

Grand?Total?All?Species????????205???????1,165???91,499?????145,538????????????

Source:???USDA?Market?News?Service,?Las?Cruces,?NM????????????????????????????????????????
??????????John?Langenegger?(575)527-6861?FAX(575)527-6868??LasCruces.LGMN@ams.usda.gov????
??????????www.ams.usda.gov/mnreports/AL_LS600.txt?????????????????????????????????????????
??????????www.ams.usda.gov/lsmarketnews???

0848M?LG????????????????????????????????????????????????

Source: http://www.cattlenetwork.com/cattle-news/markets/feeder-cattle/Texas-to-Mexico-Daily-Livestock-Exports-148270-136434893.html

last minute halloween costumes rum diary klipsch image s4 chris bosh world series october 28 2011 october 28 2011

2010 Chevrolet Malibu - Sarasota Ford - Sarasota, FL

Accessibility

  • View text version

Tags

chevrolet malibu 2010

Upload Details

Uploaded via SlideShare as Adobe PDF

Usage Rights

? All Rights Reserved

Flagged as inappropriate Flag as inappropriate
Flag as inappropriate

Select your reason for flagging this presentation as inappropriate. If needed, use the feedback form to let us know more details.

Cancel
File a copyright complaint

Statistics

Favorites
0
Downloads
0
Comments
0
Embed Views
0
Views on SlideShare
114
Total Views
114

Source: http://www.slideshare.net/SarasotaFord/2010-chevrolet-malibu-sarasota-ford-sarasota-fl-10737585

pasadena famu famu martina mcbride terry jones andy reid elf on the shelf

Sunday, January 1, 2012

Sports: SDSU improves to 12-2 this season with a 94-43 victory against Redlands.

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://www.facebook.com/dailyaztec/posts/10150565695046834

x factor winner footlocker julia gillard julia gillard pecan pie the hobbit trailer prometheus trailer

Mitchell Bard: Ignoring the Publicity Seekers: A New Year's Resolution We Should All Make

While you sometimes have to convince skeptics that politics matter, it's even harder to get people to see that the decisions the media make when it comes to pop culture are important. But they are. We live in a time in which celebrity is not only something that often comes without being earned by any achievement, but fame is inescapable in our culture and the focus of so much attention on television and online.

I think we're paying a price for our obsession with faux celebrity. So even though I know it's a losing battle, my 2012 New Year's resolution is meant to take a shot at fighting back.

My 2012 New Year's resolution is to ignore people who receive news coverage despite the fact that, by any reasonable approach, they shouldn't matter as public figures.

Of course, when the subject of famous for being famous comes up, the first people to spring to mind are the members of a certain family whose late patriarch was an attorney for O.J. Simpson, mainly three of the daughters who seem to be famous for marrying professional athletes and shopping. This family (I won't name them and violate my resolution before 2012 even begins, but you know who I'm talking about) is the low hanging fruit of the faux celebrity phenomenon and the symbol of an entire class of reality show "celebrities" who are famous even though they have literally done nothing to warrant attention other than being on television. (This very online publication saw fit to feature on its front page the pregnancy of a woman whose claim to fame is having an affair with a professional golfer.)

It all reminds me of an exchange between Jason Alexander's George and a television executive played by Bob Balaban in the Seinfeld episode "The Pitch," in which the executive asks George why people would watch a show about nothing, and George responds, "Because it's on TV." The 20 years of television history since the episode ran seem to support the idea that George was right.

But I'm not just talking about the famous-for-being-famous set. Sometimes people used to matter but don't anymore. Or at least shouldn't. This week a former SNL performer, who hasn't had an acting gig of note since she left the show nearly 20 years ago, was in the news because she said the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the U.S. government and is going to institute Sharia law. (Again, I'm not naming her.) If my next-door-neighbor said the same thing, no newspaper, website, television network or even community newsletter would cover it. Why? Because it's the rantings of a bats*$t-crazy lunatic. But because she was on a successful comedy show 20 years ago it's news? No.

Put another way, if this former actress announced she was switching from an iPhone to an Android phone, would the press cover it? No. Why? Because she doesn't matter. (Right or wrong, if Angelina Jolie swapped phones, there would be articles analyzing the underlying meaning. It's clear the former SNL performer only gets coverage for saying crazy crap.) So if she doesn't matter when she talks about mundane things, we shouldn't care about her isnane conspiracy theories, either.

Besides, it's pretty clear the actress gets this. When she says nutso things, the press covers it. When she doesn't (as happened for close to 20 years), she lives in obscurity. Clearly she's doing it to get publicity. Why give it to her?

So who cares if the press covers pseudo stars and washed up performers? I do, because the same mentality has seeped into politics.

This week a sitting member of Congress who is seeking the Republican nomination for the presidency made the obviously false, seriously insane charge, "The president can put abortion pills for girls 8 years of age, 11 years of age, on the bubblegum aisle." You may think, "Well, it's Michele Bachmann. Everyone knows she says ridiculous, false things all the time." But why does she? I don't believe she actually thinks the president wants to make morning-after pills available to minors in the candy section of stores. Even she has to know that's not true.

But she also knows that she will get attention when she says crazy, false, incendiary things. It's not like she can impress people with her intelligence, knowledge, depth of thought, competence or insightful proposals. Controversial is all she has, especially now that her campaign is deader than Kris Humphries' marriage (I can name him because he has an actual skill and reason to be covered, at least by the sports press). And it's a lesson learned from those who can only find celebrity through acting crazy.

Not that Bachmann is the only no-chance candidate making use of this tactic. Rick Santorum has made the obviously false statements that universities are liberal "indoctrination centers" and the president is a proponent of Marxism. Rick Perry decided to release a gay-bashing television commercial and was happy to relay an obviously false patient anecdote about the new health care law. The lesson is clear: Controversial statements get press, no matter how false, hateful or insane they are.

Clearly, the media has to (and should) publicize when a public official says something that is false and crazy. The public needs information with which to make civic and electoral decisions, and knowing that a politician has no problem lying to make a point and/or has off-the-wall beliefs is absolutely relevant.

But if a reality television star used to have a lousy hairstyle, well, I'm quite sure we can survive as a democracy without knowing this nugget of information.

So I resolve in 2012 not to contribute to the publicity of people that don't matter. If any of the far more powerful members of the media decide to follow suit, I think that would be a really good thing for our democracy.

And it's in the hands of all Americans not to allow themselves to be sucked into the nonsense, whether it's reality television celebrities, long-past-it performers or even politicians prone to attention-getting false and outrageous statements. The press may have to cover the controversy-baiting politicians, but Americans don't have to take them seriously.

It's not like the Michele Bachmanns, Ricky Perrys and Rick Santorums of the world need more encouragement to belch out outlandish lies and hateful charges to get publicity.

?

Follow Mitchell Bard on Twitter: www.twitter.com/MitchellBard

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/ignoring-the-publicity-se_b_1174516.html

reed hastings mayan calendar dog the bounty hunter ryan seacrest jenny mccarthy one republic